default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Not you?||
Logout|My Dashboard

Drugs, money and religion - El Paso Inc.: News

Drugs, money and religion

What's at stake in Mexico's presidential election

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:00 am

WASHINGTON - The United States isn't the only country facing a contentious presidential election this year.

Mexico will elect a new president in July, and some experts think the National Action Party, known as PAN, will be ousted from office by the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI. PRI held power for 71 years before the PAN took over in 2000.

Roderic Ai Camp, professor of the Pacific Rim at Claremont McKenna College, said that two issues are likely to be important to voters: raising incomes and reducing violence.

He spoke at a recent forum sponsored by the Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars Mexico Institute and the Hispanic Division of the Library of Congress.

"It will be interesting to see what PRI is really proposing that will be different from PAN on two major issues," Camp said. "One is how do you increase personal income, and how do you reduce violence, therefore increase personal security."

Religion may be a third issue, Camp said. The Catholic Church has played a major role in politics, coming under fire at times when it has spoken out against officials and pushed democracy in the last 15 years.

"They were critical in urging ordinary Mexicans to vote, both in 1994 and in 2000," Camp said.

He said there is little academic work done on the relationship between politics and religion in Mexico because scholars choose not to explore the subject.

"The church plays two roles. It has always been a critic of neoliberalism," Camp said. "There is an agreement on human rights. They would stand up for human rights, and they actually practiced this in the ‘90s. What is interesting to me is they haven't been outspoken as they have been. Only a few selective bishops have made very clear statements."

The country has been plagued by a drug war that has taken thousands of lives. Camp said the problem does not arise just from Mexico but stems from the demand for drugs in the United States.

"Members of Congress don't have the courage to address it. That's the fundamental issue. If you don't have the demand, you don't have the drug problem," Camp said.

He said 9 percent of all Americans over the age of 12 use some type of illegal drug.

"Why don't members of Congress talk about this? Because it is so much easier to say the problem is next door rather than to admit it is a social problem," Camp said. "Why are people consuming the drugs? That is a much more common message."

The political atmosphere in Mexico has been a tumultuous one the last few decades, with the drug war and the shakeup in presidential elections.

Camp is one of the foremost experts on politics in Mexico and is frequently consulted in the areas of comparative elites, church-state relations and civil-military affairs. Last year he released three books, "Oxford Handbook of Mexican Politics," "Mexican Political Biographies" and "Mexico, What Everyone Needs to Know," that discuss the lives of politicians and topics relating to political institutions.

"He in a way is a synthesis of so much knowledge of Mexico," said Miguel E. Basáñez, professor at the Fletcher School of Tufts University, said. "When you look at the structure of the handbook, you can see what is Rod's brilliance."

© 2015 El Paso Inc.. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Comments may be printed in El Paso Inc. or affiliated publications' print editions.
  • 2 Comments may be edited for space and clarity.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • malcolmkyle posted at 7:55 am on Tue, Jan 31, 2012.

    malcolmkyle Posts: 6

    In addition to the many societal costs of prohibition, it has a long history of driving the spread of harder or more dangerous drugs.

    * Poppies to morphine to heroine to krokodil
    * Coca to cocaine to crack
    * Ephedra to ephredrine to speed to methamphetamine
    * Marijuana to skunk to dangerous synthetic concoctions such as 'spice' or 'bath salts'
    * Mushrooms to ecstasy to 2CB/designers

    At every step the reasons for the rise in popularity of the new form of the drug are one or more of the following:

    * It may easier to smuggle.
    * It may be more addictive, thus compelling the buyer to return more frequently.
    * It may be cheaper to produce therefore yielding more profit.
    * Like a game of "whack a mole" a shutdown of producers in one area will mean business opportunities for another set of producers with a similar product.

    Prohibition's distortion of the immutable laws of supply and demand subsidizes organized crime, foreign terrorists, corrupt cops & politicians and feeds the prejudices of self-appointed culture warriors. So called Tough-On-Drugs politicians have happily built careers on confusing drug prohibition's horrendous collateral damage with the substances that they claim to be fighting, while the big losers in this battle are everybody else, especially taxpayers.

    How come so many of us have been deluded into believing that big government is the appropriate response to non-traditional consensual vices?

    Imagine if we were to chop down every single tree on the planet as a response to our failure to prevent tree-climbing accidents. That's what our misguided drug policy looks like. Isn't it time we all stood up and told the government we're tired of being beaten and jailed so that pharmaceutical companies can poison and kill us for obscene profits?

    Prohibition Prevents Regulation : Legalize, Regulate and Tax!